Example work

Working examples.

See how a supporting tool can keep a hold visible, leave a QC exception open, and require preparation checks before a handoff.

I built these demonstrations independently with fictional data. All organizations, people, records, values, criteria, and dates are invented. These are interface examples, not client projects, employer systems, or analytical procedures.

01 · Sample visibility

Sample tracking

A queue showing stages, owners, and holds. On-hold work stays visible so the follow-up doesn’t disappear.

Sample workflowFictional data · Interface preview

Received1
Logged1
Prep2
Analysis1
Review1
Complete1

Sample queue All dates in this preview are in October 2026.
Sample / client / project	Method / analyst	Due	Stage	Priority	Status / updated
DEMO-101Juniper Demo Works · Soil study	Metals in soil · illustrativeMorgan Vale	16 Oct	Received	Routine	Awaiting sample logging14 Oct · 13:52
DEMO-102Meadowglass Demo Co. · Water study	Metals in water · illustrativeAvery Lane	16 Oct	Logged	Routine	Ready for prep14 Oct · 13:40
DEMO-103Meadowglass Demo Co. · Water study	Metals in water · illustrativeAvery Lane	15 Oct	Prep	Routine	In progress14 Oct · 14:05
DEMO-104Meadowglass Demo Co. · Water study	Metals in water · illustrativeAvery Lane	15 Oct	Prep	High	On hold14 Oct · 14:12
DEMO-105Juniper Demo Works · Soil study	Metals in soil · illustrativeMorgan Vale	15 Oct	Analysis	High	In progress14 Oct · 13:35
DEMO-106Meadowglass Demo Co. · Water study	Metals in water · illustrativeCasey Rowan	14 Oct	Review	Routine	Review needed14 Oct · 11:48
DEMO-107Juniper Demo Works · Soil study	Metals in soil · illustrativeMorgan Vale	14 Oct	Complete	Routine	Workflow closed14 Oct · 10:22

Record in focus

DEMO-103 · Preparation in progress

Assigned to Avery Lane. Next handoff: analysis after preparation is checked.

Received: 13 Oct · 09:10
Logged: 13 Oct · 09:28
Prep started: 14 Oct · 13:30
Last update: 14 Oct · 14:05

View DEMO-103 stage history and queue exceptions

13 Oct · 09:10Received · Morgan Vale recorded receipt.
13 Oct · 09:28Logged · Avery Lane assigned Metals in water · illustrative.
14 Oct · 13:30Prep · Avery Lane started preparation.
14 Oct · 14:05Prep note · Initial preparation steps recorded.

DEMO-104 is on hold: preparation volume needs confirmation; Avery Lane owns the follow-up.

DEMO-106 needs review: Casey Rowan is assigned to check the record before the workflow can close.

Fictional workflow status only. “Complete” does not represent authorization to release analytical results.

Problem: Sample status can become spread across spreadsheets, email, paper, and separate systems.
Tool: A queue with filters and a selected sample’s stage, owner, due date, and next action.
Intended benefit: Help staff find the next action without losing sight of work that is on hold.

How this could fit alongside existing systems

The lab would define the stages, owners, and handoff rules. A small first tool could track just one supporting queue. Which records remain authoritative, how updates reach this view, and whether an integration is available would be agreed before building.

02 · Review with context

QC review

A QC list with an unresolved duplicate warning. Checking every item still leaves the batch disposition to a reviewer.

Batch review · DEMO-QC08Fictional data · Interface preview

Sample records: 2
QC checks: 4 within range · 1 warning
Reviewer: Casey Rowan
Review status: In progress

QC checks Invented criteria for this demonstration only.
Record / type	Observed	Example criterion	Indicator	Reviewer status
DEMO-BLK08Method blank	0.3 µg/L	≤ 1.0 µg/L	Within range	Checked · 11:20
DEMO-SPK08Spike	94% recovery	90–110%	Within range	Checked · 11:24
DEMO-DUP08Duplicate pair	13% RPD	≤ 10%	Warning	Review needed
DEMO-CAL08Calibration check	102% recovery	90–110%	Within range	Checked · 11:30
DEMO-REF08Reference check	99% recovery	90–110%	Within range	Awaiting review

Open review item

Duplicate exceeds the example criterion

Casey Rowan · Original snapshot · 14 Oct 2026, 11:36

Check the preparation notes and duplicate calculation before deciding the next step. Keep the sample review open.

Disposition: pending reviewer decision · No automatic acceptance or release.

View sample results and demo review history

Fictional sample results
Sample	Component	Result	Review status
DEMO-106	Lead	24.8 µg/L	Pending duplicate review
DEMO-108	Lead	25.1 µg/L	Pending batch review

RPD means relative percent difference: the absolute difference between a duplicate pair divided by its mean, multiplied by 100. The displayed RPD and recoveries are illustrative values, not calculations performed by this page; the underlying duplicate and spike measurements are not included. These criteria are not requirements for real analysis.

Original fictional snapshot

14 Oct · 11:12Morgan Vale · Submitted the example batch for review.
14 Oct · 11:20Casey Rowan · Recorded the blank check.
14 Oct · 11:36Casey Rowan · Added a duplicate-review comment.
14 Oct · 11:48Review remains open · Reference check and duplicate disposition pending.

“Within range” refers only to the invented criterion. A recorded check does not resolve the duplicate warning, accept a batch, or release results.

Problem: Reviewers may need to check repetitive QC conditions across several files or systems.
Tool: A review list with explicit check states, observations, and a visible unresolved exception.
Intended benefit: Make checked items easier to distinguish from unresolved analytical decisions.

Where human review stays in the process

The laboratory would define the applicable checks, criteria, permissions, and review requirements. A flag would direct attention to a condition; an authorized reviewer would interpret it and decide what happens next. This preview makes no validation, regulatory-compliance, or result-release claim.

03 · Work and documentation

Preparation workspace

A preparation checklist with linked references and a pending handoff. Each step depends on the preceding check.

Analyst workspace · Avery LaneFictional data · Interface preview

Assigned work preview

DEMO-103 is the working record below. Other assignments are shown for context.

Record shownDEMO-103 · Water studyMetals in water · illustrative · Aqueous preparationIn progressDue 15 Oct · Started 13:30
DEMO-104 · Water studyMetals in water · illustrative · Aqueous preparationOn hold · High priorityDue 15 Oct · Volume confirmation needed
DEMO-102 · Water studyMetals in water · illustrative · Aqueous preparationReady for prepDue 16 Oct · Assigned 13:40

Preparation record · DEMO-103

Metals in water · illustrative / revision 1

Avery Lane · Started 14 Oct 2026, 13:30

Confirm sample ID and assignmentComplete · Avery Lane · 13:32
Record aliquot and containerComplete · 5.0 mL · Container DEMO-P03 · 13:41
Record preparation volumeComplete · 50.0 mL · Avery Lane · 14:05
Check labels and preparation recordPending · Assigned to Avery Lane
Hand off for analysisPending · Preparation check required first

Original snapshot note · 14:05

Preparation volume recorded for DEMO-103. Label and record check still pending. DEMO-104 stays on hold until its volume is confirmed.

Recorded by Avery Lane · 14 Oct 2026

Linked documentationMetals in water · illustrative · rev 1 Preparation handoff checklist

Read the fictional method reference

Metals in water · illustrative · Revision 1

Fictional workflow reference: confirm the assignment, record the aliquot and preparation volume, check the label and record, then document the handoff.

This illustrates how a method reference could be linked to an assignment. It is not an analytical procedure or instructions for real laboratory work.

Read the fictional preparation handoff checklist

Sample ID and container label checked.
Required preparation entries reviewed.
Open questions assigned to an owner.
Handoff status recorded after the preceding checks. A real workflow would also define the receiving analyst and handoff details.

In this snapshot, DEMO-103 has not reached this handoff. DEMO-104 still has an open preparation question.

A checked step represents a demo workflow action, not approval of the preparation or analytical record.

Problem: Assignments, preparation notes, and completion checks can be scattered across separate lists and documents.
Tool: One preparation checklist with ordered steps, notes, and a linked workflow reference.
Intended benefit: Keep unfinished checks visible before work moves to analysis.

What a real preparation tool would need

Record ownership, required fields, editing permissions, change history, retention, and review responsibilities would need to follow the lab’s requirements. A first tool could show preparation checks while the lab’s existing system holds the official record.

Start with your workflow

What would be useful in your lab?

Tell me which task takes extra effort and how your team handles it today.

Email me about a workflow

Opens your email application. See how I work and my availability.

A useful first note

Tell me which example is closest to your situation, where information lives today, and what makes the task difficult.

Keep it high-level. Please leave out sample data, customer records, credentials, and other confidential information.

How I work